Business
In a new effort to promote the widespread adoption of Nutri-Score, dozens of public and private health entities have endorsed an open letter to the French government supporting the front-of-pack labeling system (FOPL).
The signatories, including the French Society of Hepatology (AFEF) and the French Society of Public Health (SFSP), argue that Nutri-Score is necessary to curb the country’s considerable healthcare challenges.
Nutri-Score has proven to be a very useful instrument for raising public awareness of correct consumption, thanks to its ease of interpretation.- Authors, open letter
“The anti-Nutri-Score mobilization of large industrial groups has unfortunately found the support of several political figures, in defiance of the major public health challenges with which France is increasingly confronted, such as obesity, cancers, cardiovascular disease, diabetes,” the letter reads.
See Also:European Commission Announces Public Consultation on Food LabelingThe signatories believe that criticism of Nutri-Score could hinder its chances of being selected by the European Commission as the pan-European FOPL, which Brussels will announce by the end of the year.
Nutri-Score was adopted in France in 2017. Since then, the five-color/letter FOPL has spread to several other European countries, including Germany and Switzerland.
Nutri-Score rates food items using their main nutrient contents, such as sodium, sugar, calories and fats, per 100 grams or 100 milliliters. Each food item receives a score ranging from the healthiest “Green A” to the least healthy “Red E.”
Nutri-Score’s classification algorithm has been met with skepticism in several European countries, most notably Italy. Producers of local specialty products have also voiced their concerns about the Nutri-Score.
The producers association behind Roquefort cheese in France called the logo “simplistic.” They argued it unjustly punishes traditional specialties protected by the European Union in the form of Protected Designations of Origin and Protected Geographical Indications.
“Ultra-processed industrial food products which contain preservatives obtain an A or a B [on the Nutri-Score scale] while very natural local products are stigmatized [with a D or an E],” said Sébastien Vignette, secretary-general of the confederation Roquefort.
The producer associations behind Italian Parmigiano Reggiano and Grana Padano PDOs in Italy and several Spanish food companies also have echoed similar concerns.
The new mobilization to support Nutri-Score’s adoption follows a similar appeal filed last December by more than 1,000 health care professionals.
“The campaign launched against the Nutri-Score by the producers of Roquefort, followed by those of Rocamadour, Maroilles and many other cheeses and cold cuts, is based on the emblematic image enjoyed by these products in French gastronomy, their anchoring territorial and their traditional side,” the health professionals said.
“They imply that these properties, all worthy of consideration, would give them qualities that would make them unassailable in terms of their nutritional composition,” they added.
See Also:Nutri-Score CoverageAccording to the health professionals, Nutri-Score “meets a dual objective: to better inform consumers about the nutritional quality of foods and allow them to compare [food items] with each other; encourage manufacturers to improve the composition of their products.”
“The choice of the logo was made by the government on the basis of recognized scientific work,” they added. “Since 2017, its positive effect has been documented by new research.”
In the opinion of the health professionals, “Nutri-Score has proven to be a very useful instrument for raising public awareness of correct consumption, thanks to its ease of interpretation, which simplifies the reading of the nutritional values specific to different foods.”
“France, therefore, has a public health tool which, in line with other public health measures, can make it possible to have an effect on the nutritional status and health of our fellow citizens,” they concluded.
More articles on: France, Nutri-Score, olive oil labeling
May. 1, 2024
Australian Olive Association Implements Quality Monitoring Program
The program aims to assure Australians that olive oils are correctly labeled and meet the necessary standards at a time of increasing prices.
Jan. 29, 2024
Meet the Man Trying to Transform the Olive Sector in France
Yannick Masmondet is working with farmers to plant 50,000 hectares of olive groves on unused agricultural land, expanding national production while diversifying farmer portfolios.
Feb. 19, 2024
How One Producer Deals with Rising Volumes and A Shorter Harvest in France
In the South of France, the producer behind Mas des Bories manages a bumper harvest and a shorter window to mill.
Feb. 20, 2024
New Research Rekindles Debate on Nutri-Score’s Effectiveness
The OECD found Nutri-Score could save money on healthcare. Dutch researchers questioned the integrity of studies supporting the labeling system.
Sep. 18, 2024
Danone Plans to Abandon Nutri-Score on Many of Its Products
The French multinational is distancing itself from the front-of-pack labeling system after a recent change to the algorithm lowered the score of several of its products.
Oct. 25, 2024
Romania Sets New Rules for Nutri-Score Adoption
After an initial ban, the Romanian government said Nutri-Score labels can be applied voluntarily on some items.
Jan. 3, 2024
In South West France, Plans to Make More Olive Oil
Officials in Lot-et-Garonne plan to take advantage of the favorable climate and rich water resources to increase production.
Dec. 12, 2023
Production Rebound Still Expected in France After Mixed Harvest
Production could rise to 4,400 tons, though some producers are seeing worse yields than last year.