With counterfeiting and quality issues a constant problem for Australian food brands, some experts believe that provenance branding is the key to safeguarding quality.
Australian producers of exported, high-end consumer food products (including olive oil) looking to secure a larger share of their retail earnings should consider collaborating to secure “regional provenance branding,” says a report by the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC).
This should allow farmers to more effectively capture and protect the additional value they create by generating provenance-based goodwill in those markets.- Rural Industries Research and Development Corp.
While this approach is recommended as a means of safeguarding regional products against freeloading producers from hitching on the bandwagon (something that poses a constant threat in Asian markets, where cheap imitation products are a constant threat), it comes with its own hurdles, in the form of GI (Geographical Indication) registrations — something only available to the Australian wine industry.
The report is titled “Local to Global: Provenance Branding and Farmer Co-operation for High-Value Export Markets” and is written by legal experts William van Caenegem and Lucie Tréguier and geographical governance expert Jen Cleary.
It puts forward that Australia should be expanding its GI registration scheme to allow other foods and beverages to register as a proactive measure against counterfeiting, which plagues Asian countries like China and Japan.
The report even cites instances of luxury food product packaging bearing Australian locations on inauthentic goods such as oysters and abalone. With food exports to these regions doubling to over AUS $9 billion over the last five years thanks in part to a burgeoning upper middle-class population (one that is set to reach 180 million by 2022); this should be a cause for concern for all Australian specialist food exporters.
In addition to safeguarding the quality of products in international markets, provenance branding would also go a long way towards combatting the recent quality scandals plaguing the international olive oil market.
Currently, many Australian olive oil producers are already part of geographical organizations and associations, which would make collective regional provenance branding through GI certification and trademark significantly easier.
This method of branding allows for each individual producer to retain their unique corporate branding and imagery. The idea of expanding provenance branding already has the support of several parties, including the European Union Ambassador to Australia.
Chris Mercer, president of Olives Western Australia, told Olive Oil Times that while there is indeed a growing need for growers to protect their brands overseas and that grower groups can find strength in numbers, the fact that GI protection is still limited to the wine industry and that overseas GI branding is only possible once domestic GI branding has been attained, means that certification this way is not likely to happen anytime soon unless these issues are dealt with.
The report concludes by mentioning that while technological branding solutions such as holographic marks and QR codes can be used as safeguarding measures, the authors of the report believe these strategies are “short-lived in their efficacy” and producers should seek out a more effective and long-term solution to protect their high-value provenance brands.
This is something that Mercer disagrees with, as he believes that technological protection is still an effective measure and that the systems currently available (including the “Australian Authentic” program) are more than effective for the time being.
More articles on: Australia, import/export, olive oil labeling
Dec. 10, 2024
Italian Producers Grapple with Market Instability
Record olive oil imports paired with lowered yields have compounded the worries of the sector.
Jan. 28, 2025
Moroccan Producers Face Third Straight Year of Declining Production
Olive oil production is expected to fall to 90,000 metric tons, resulting in rapidly rising prices and fears of a shortage.
Apr. 9, 2024
Tunisian Ag Minister Urges Sector to Take Advantage of Bumper Harvest
Olive oil production rebounded in the 2023/24 crop year. Abdelmonem Belati believes the sector must work together to export extra virgin olive oil quickly.
Jun. 26, 2024
Rising Olive Oil Imports Contribute to Spain’s Trade Deficit with Argentina
While Spain’s agricultural trade deficit fell by 33 percent between 2022 and 2023, olive oil imports increased by nearly 230 percent due to a poor harvest and rising prices.
May. 1, 2024
Australian Olive Association Implements Quality Monitoring Program
The program aims to assure Australians that olive oils are correctly labeled and meet the necessary standards at a time of increasing prices.
Oct. 31, 2024
Turkey Lifts Ban on Bulk Olive Oil Exports
The move comes when stocks are high in Turkey and non-existent in Europe. Another bumper harvest is expected.
May. 7, 2024
Olive Oil Export Ban Sours Table Olive Sales in Turkey
While table olive exports soared in the first five months of the 2023/24 campaign, the ban on olive oil exports is blamed for holding the sector back.
Oct. 18, 2024
European Union Olive Oil Production Set to Grow by One-Third
Brussels’ autumn short-term outlook predicts volatile prices.